<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Scar Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meetjesusatuni.com/2011/08/13/the-scar-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meetjesusatuni.com/2011/08/13/the-scar-project/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:50:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://meetjesusatuni.com/2011/08/13/the-scar-project/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthurandtamie.wordpress.com/?p=4349#comment-2110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is incredibly confronting. I must admit I was initially repulsed by the first image, but I think that is my cultual wiring coming to the fore. I was also struck by the fact she is pregnant - I was thinking about how that woman misses out on breastfeeding. That deeply saddens me - that those breasts will never nurse that baby. (What does she do if her milk comes in and she has no nipple to get rid of it? I suppose she would take drugs that suppress milk production then? Or does she have no breast tissue left capable of making milk?)

Anyway, I get sidetracked when breasts are the topic these days - it always ends up about breastfeeding. I really think of boobs differently after 3.5+ years of breastfeeding and seeing women getting their boobs out for babies and children 4+ years old (you only see that kind of thing in specific places in Australia, but yes, some Australian women don&#039;t wean at 1). 

I think part of the lack of sexualisation is the lack of nipple(s). It seems to be in most magazines that we can be shown any amount of a women&#039;s breast except for the nipple and that is &quot;okay&quot;. 

There is one woman whom you can tell has been crying - a tear has run down her cheek. It is a very powerful image for all its vulnerability.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is incredibly confronting. I must admit I was initially repulsed by the first image, but I think that is my cultual wiring coming to the fore. I was also struck by the fact she is pregnant &#8211; I was thinking about how that woman misses out on breastfeeding. That deeply saddens me &#8211; that those breasts will never nurse that baby. (What does she do if her milk comes in and she has no nipple to get rid of it? I suppose she would take drugs that suppress milk production then? Or does she have no breast tissue left capable of making milk?)</p>
<p>Anyway, I get sidetracked when breasts are the topic these days &#8211; it always ends up about breastfeeding. I really think of boobs differently after 3.5+ years of breastfeeding and seeing women getting their boobs out for babies and children 4+ years old (you only see that kind of thing in specific places in Australia, but yes, some Australian women don&#8217;t wean at 1). </p>
<p>I think part of the lack of sexualisation is the lack of nipple(s). It seems to be in most magazines that we can be shown any amount of a women&#8217;s breast except for the nipple and that is &#8220;okay&#8221;. </p>
<p>There is one woman whom you can tell has been crying &#8211; a tear has run down her cheek. It is a very powerful image for all its vulnerability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
