Menu Home

When prosperity and holiness are friends, not enemies

“If you want a sermon to learn about riches,” said the preacher, “go elsewhere, because we are talking about the pathway to our permanent home.”

Then he spent the rest of the sermon talking about attaining success.

It was one of those moments when I realised again that what westerners mean by prosperity gospel and what Tanzanians mean by prosperity gospel are two completely different things, such that it’s easy to lump in with the prosperity preachers those who see themselves as quite distinct.

Actually, the topic of the sermon was holiness. (He was a guest preacher, a friend of the pastor, and apparently holiness is his thing and he preaches on it every time he comes. This was our first time hearing him.) He took as his text Hebrews 12:4 “In your struggle against sin, you have not yet resisted to the point of shedding your blood.” He had two main points:

  • The Bible gives us testimony of those who stood firm and conquered (in Hebrews 11)
  • We must fight sin until the very end (how you finish is more important than how you start)

I gather he was making these to counteract some common myths in Tanzania, which are:

  • You have to choose between success and holiness
  • You are powerless against sin and other powers

A particularly powerful part of the sermon was his own testimony of when he was a student at university, and he and one other friend refused to buy the exam questions which the lecturer was selling. These exam questions weren’t just for that lecturer’s course, but for all the courses — the lecturer was notorious for stealing and selling his colleagues’ exam papers! The preacher came from a poor background and desperately needed to pass, but because of his Christian faith, he refused to buy the stolen exam papers, instead crying out to God and concentrating on studying.

As it turned out, several of the lecturers had cottoned on to what their colleague was doing and prepared two exam papers: one which was leaked and sold, and another which was actually given to the students. It was the preacher and his friend who succeeded in the exam. They had comprehensive knowledge because they had studied the whole curriculum rather than just what was on the leaked paper, and because, in his words, the Holy Spirit had led them to the right parts of the curriculum to study. Everyone in their class was amazed that resisting sin profited these young Christian men.

It is commonplace in Tanzania to use these kinds of stories to encourage people to persevere. The phrase in Swahili is ‘usikate tamaa’. It literally means, “do not despair.” A sign of despair would be going to a witchdoctor (instead of praying to God), or buying a stolen test (instead of resisting sin). Another sign of despair is canvassing the idea that perhaps God will not vindicate or rescue this time. To say so seems to carry almost perlocutionary power, as if by asking the question, you are willing it into reality. This means that the questions that immediately occur to me (for example, if they didn’t pass, was their resistance of sin worth it?) are not considered.

But the preacher’s goal is not to give you a formula for success. It’s to encourage you towards holiness. And what he’s doing here is telling you that it’s not true that you need to choose between holiness and success. He is a living breathing example that following God’s ways can bring prosperity. This teaching means that pursuing holiness becomes an option for those who want to improve their lives.

The preacher was very careful to avoid passivity on the part of the believer. In a fear-power worldview, your own agency is minimised. You are at the mercy of the powers and can’t necessarily be held responsible for your actions, because they have been caused by someone or something else. Therefore, to argue that you have the power to resist sin is a big deal, especially when you feel very small and insignificant in a world of powerful forces.

A theology of intercession encourages the believer that they are not alone in this fight, because they have God on their side. He said that prayer is a major weapon in the fight against sin, and the Holy Spirit cries out for us when we have no words. So is the knowledge that the same Son who died for your sin also intercedes at the Father’s right hand for you. But, be warned, he continued this does not negate your personal responsibility. Faith is dead without deeds, so you must play your part. Fasting, reading, singing, and other Christian disciplines starve and suffocate evil spirits. Being part of a Christian community is essential, so that you can assist one another and care for one another.

Notice here how sophisticated Tanzanian preaching can be. The preacher integrated ecclesiology and soteriology, provided theologies of sanctification and prayer, put the issues in Trinitarian context, had poignant illustrations, and responded powerfully to false assumptions in the religious worldview of his culture. All of this gets missed if we are preoccupied with his use of the word ‘success’. In this case, any suspicion is unwarranted, because as the preacher spoke of success and prosperity, he clearly pointed his listeners towards a life of discipleship.

Categories: Church Tanzania Written by Tamie

Tagged as:

Tamie Davis

Tamie Davis is an Aussie living in Tanzania, writing at meetjesusatuni.com.

7 replies

  1. Thanks Tamie. Really helpful to hear the content and your reflections as well. Particularly it was helpful to see how the fear/power worldview minimizes agency. And as I reflected, its seems that choice between success and holiness is influential and often leads people to being quite pragmatic in order to succeed rather than choosing the harder path.

    One thing that I want to reflect on further is that what I seem to be witnessing in Cambodian Christianity (granted I may not have understood correctly yet with language and culture barriers still needing to be broken) is that there seems to be to quick a move from no agency (fear/power worldview) to maybe an ‘over-agency’ application. That is emphasizing too much our response or application such that its all about our agency. Now there is probably lots of reasons for this that I’m still trying to work through. But in my very early stages of trying to read culture and reflect on what I’m seeing, it seems like the agency of God is sometimes minimized (or he will do it in light of our prayer and obedience). I can see that human agency is important as we try and teach people in a fear/power worldview, but sometimes I think God’s actions (particularly in grace) are minimized. So it application seems to end up being about praying more or being more faithful. Do you see this in your context as well or not?

    1. Yes, this was a question I had listening yesterday. There was a lot about how we need to reach out and accept what God has made available or enacted. My natural preference would be to emphasise God’s action in that because we tend to be so self-reliant and proud. But if you come from a culture of passivity, I can see why the accepting angle would be emphasised. However, I did wonder whether the sermon boiled down to ‘you have to try harder’.

      I think the thing that kept it from becoming that was his strong sense that any power to try harder comes from God’s empowering. I suspect that sounds kind of unreal to me because my cultural sense of the supernatural is muted, whereas it looms much larger for him.

      He did have God’s actions on view, but they were different actions from what I would normally be drawn to. For example, the cross – and especially PSA – was not central to his message. The advocacy of Christ and the Spirit were far more important, as was the indwelling/empowering of the Spirit. So I think I would say the grace of God was on view, but it wasn’t the grace of God as we normally talk about it in the western church. This causes me to consider whether the doctrines that I cherish are more to do with my cultural background (of guilt/innocence).

  2. Interesting to think about how our muted sense of the supernatural is muted so we might see God’s presence or action less.

    I think you’re right that we do need to interrogate our doctrines. I’d be interested to think through the doctrines that we find more emphasized in Africa and Asia and if they are coming out of a Pentecostal (and so still having a Western background as an origin) influence and for those that aren’t clearly Pentecostal in flavour how they are arising. Have you thought much about Pentecostal influences broader than just the prosperity gospel? You guys do great work on helping us see the nuances of prosperity from an African perspective, have you thought more broadly about other areas of doctrine?

    1. Yes, Arthur and I were just talking about this yesterday, and trying to decide whether to write a blog post on it, or save the content for home assignment (or both). There are some key phrases that come up consistently and are probably quite a good window into or summary of Tanzanian theology.

      The question of Pentecostalism is an interesting one – the argument that it is western in background is contested. We did some work on it a few of years back: https://meetjesusatuni.com/tag/pentecostalism/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: